The aim of the first studies on the quality of scientific journals was about how to filter the most important and influential periodicals in the given scientific field to purchase for the libraries of particularly small American colleges to stimulate their development (Gross & Gross, 1927). The idea that was not initially aimed at research evaluation was then developed to one of the most widely used tools—journal impact factor—with its apparent strength and shortcomings. What we nowadays understand as impact factor was presented by Eugene Garfield in 1955 which led to a publication of Science Citation Index (SCI) in 1961 (
Garfield, 2006). In order to accelerate the selection of journals for SCI, Garfield and Irving Sher have introduced journal impact factor by re-sorting the author citation index into the journal citation index, thus creating Journal Impact Factor (
Garfield, 2006). The first sample ranking of journals by impact factor appeared in 1969, which was followed by a later annual publication of Journal Citation Reports (JCR). Among the criticisms of this system were geographic (mainly US-based) and language (mainly English - language) bias of journals as a source for research (
Aksnes & Siversten, 2019). Although the Web of Science is trying to address this shortcoming by including regional and national indexes (e.g. China Knowledge Resource Integrated Database, Korean Journal Database, SciELO Citation Index, Russian Science Citation Index), there is still a huge misrepresentation of national journals and journals in national languages in the system.