[1] Arts S., Melluso N., & Veugelers R. (2025). Beyond citations: Measuring novel scientific ideas and their impact in publication text. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 1-33. https://doi.org/10.1162/rest_a_01561
[2] Bloom N., Jones C. I., Van Reenen J., & Webb M. (2020). Are ideas getting harder to find? American Economic Review, 110(4), 1104-1144. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20180338
[3] Bornmann L., Devarakonda S., Tekles A., & Chacko G. (2020a). Are disruption index indicators convergently valid? The comparison of several indicator variants with assessments by peers. Quantitative Science Studies, 1(3), 1242-1259. https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00068
[4] Bornmann L., Devarakonda S., Tekles A., & Chacko G. (2020b). Disruptive papers published in scientometrics: Meaningful results by using an improved variant of the disruption index originally proposed by Wu, Wang, and Evans (2019). Scientometrics, 123(2), 1149-1155. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03406-8
[5] Chai S.,& Menon, A. (2019). Breakthrough recognition: Bias against novelty and competition for attention. Research Policy, 48(3), 733-747. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.11.006
[6] Chu, J. S. G., & Evans, J. A. (2021). Slowed canonical progress in large fields of science. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 118(41), e2021636118. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2021636118
[7] Fortunato S., Bergstrom C. T., Boerner K., Evans J. A., Helbing D., Milojevic S., Petersen A. M., Radicchi F., Sinatra R., Uzzi B., Vespignani A., Waltman L., Wang D., & Barabasi A.-L. (2018). Science of science. Science, 359(6379), eaao0185. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aao0185
[8] Foster J. G., Rzhetsky A., & Evans J. A. (2015). Tradition and innovation in scientists’ research strategies. American Sociological Review, 80(5), 875-908. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122415601618
[9] Funk R. J.,& Owen-Smith, J. (2017). A dynamic network measure of technological change. Management Science, 63(3), 791-817. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2015.2366
[10] Jones, B. F. (2009). The burden of knowledge and the “death of the renaissance man”: Is innovation getting harder? The Review of Economic Studies, 76(1), 283-317. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-937X.2008.00531.x
[11] Jones, B. F., & Weinberg, B. A. (2011). Age dynamics in scientific creativity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 108(47), 18910-18914. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1102895108
[12] Jones B. F., Wuchty S., & Uzzi B. (2008). Multi-university research teams: Shifting impact, geography, and stratification in science. Science, 322(5905), 1259-1262. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1158357
[13] Leibel, C., & Bornmann, L. (2024). What do we know about the disruption index in scientometrics? An overview of the literature. Scientometrics, 129, 601-639. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-023-04873-5
[14] Li H., Tessone C. J., & Zeng A. (2024). Productive scientists are associated with lower disruption in scientific publishing. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 121(21), e2322462121. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2322462121
[15] Li L., Lin Y., & Wu L. (2024). Displacing science. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2402.16839
[16] Lin Y., Evans J. A.,& Wu, L. (2022). New directions in science emerge from disconnection and discord. Journal of Informetrics, 16(1), 101234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2021.101234
[17] Lin Y., Frey C. B., & Wu L. (2023). Remote collaboration fuses fewer breakthrough ideas. Nature, 623(7989), 987-991. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-06767-1
[18] Liu X., Bu Y., Li M., & Li J. (2024). Monodisciplinary collaboration disrupts science more than multidisciplinary collaboration. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 75(1), 59-78. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24840
[19] Macher J. T., Rutzer C.,& Weder, R. (2024). Is there a secular decline in disruptive patents? Correcting for measurement bias. Research Policy, 53(5), 104992. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2024.104992
[20] Park M., Leahey E., & Funk R. J. (2023). Papers and patents are becoming less disruptive over time. Nature, 613(7942), 138-144. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-05543-x
[21] Petersen A. M., Arroyave F., & Pammolli F. (2024). The disruption index is biased by citation inflation. Quantitative Science Studies, 5(4), 936-953. https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00333
[22] Radicchi F., Fortunato S., & Castellano C. (2008). Universality of citation distributions: Toward an objective measure of scientific impact. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 105(45), 17268-17272. https://doi.org/doi:10.1073/pnas.0806977105
[23] Ruan X., Lyu D., Gong K., Cheng Y.,& Li, J. (2021). Rethinking the disruption index as a measure of scientific and technological advances. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 172, 121071. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121071
[24] Uzzi B., Mukherjee S., Stringer M., & Jones B. (2013). Atypical combinations and scientific impact. Science, 342(6157), 468-472. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1240474
[25] Waltman, L. (2016). A review of the literature on citation impact indicators. Journal of Informetrics, 10(2), 365-391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2016.02.007
[26] Wang, J. (2013). Citation time window choice for research impact evaluation. Scientometrics, 94(3), 851-872. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-012-0775-9
[27] Wang J., Veugelers R.,& Stephan, P. (2017). Bias against novelty in science: A cautionary tale for users of bibliometric indicators. Research Policy, 46(8), 1416-1436. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2017.06.006
[28] Wu L. F., Wang D. S., & Evans J. A. (2019). Large teams develop and small teams disrupt science and technology. Nature, 566(7744), 378-382. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-0941-9
[29] Wuchty S., Jones B. F., & Uzzi B. (2007). The increasing dominance of teams in production of knowledge. Science, 316(5827), 1036-1039. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1136099
[30] Yang A. J. (2024). Unveiling the impact and dual innovation of funded research. Journal of Informetrics, 18(1), 101480. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2023.101480
[31] Yang A. J. (2025). Unraveling topic switching and innovation in science. Information Processing & Management, 62(4), 104171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2025.104171
[32] Yang, A. J., & Deng, S. (2024). Dynamic patterns of the disruptive and consolidating knowledge flows in Nobel-winning scientific breakthroughs. Quantitative Science Studies, 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00323
[33] Yang A. J., Deng S., Wang H., Zhang Y.,& Yang, W. (2023). Disruptive coefficient and 2-step disruptive coefficient: Novel measures for identifying vital nodes in complex networks. Journal of Informetrics, 17(3), 101411. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2023.101411
[34] Yang A. J., Gong H., Wang Y., Zhang C., & Deng S. (2024). Rescaling the disruption index reveals the universality of disruption distributions in science. Scientometrics, 129(1), 561-580. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-023-04889-x
[35] Yang A. J., Hu H., Zhao Y., Wang H.,& Deng, S. (2023). From consolidation to disruption: A novel way to measure the impact of scientists and identify laureates. Information Processing & Management, 60(5), 103420. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2023.103420
[36] Yang A. J., Xu H., Ding Y., & Liu M. (2024). Unveiling the dynamics of team age structure and its impact on scientific innovation. Scientometrics, 129, 6127-6148. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-024-04987-4
[37] Yang A. J., Yan X., Hu H., Hu H., Kong J., & Deng S. (2025). Are disruptive papers more likely to impact technology and society? Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 76(3), 563-579. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24947
[38] Yang Y., Tian T. Y., Woodruff T. K., Jones B. F., & Uzzi B. (2022). Gender-diverse teams produce more novel and higher-impact scientific ideas. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 119(36), e2200841119. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2200841119
[39] Zeng A., Fan Y., Di Z., Wang Y., & Havlin S. (2023). Disruptive papers in science are losing impact. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2305.03589
[40] Zeng A., Shen Z. S., Zhou J. L., Wu J. S., Fan Y., Wang Y. G.,& Stanley, H. E. (2017). The science of science: From the perspective of complex systems. Physics Reports, 714, 1-73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2017.10.001
