Purpose: Examining the alignment (or “fit”) of China’s science and technology talent policies provides valuable insights into the challenges and shortcomings in supporting talent development, thereby offering a foundation for enhanced policy design and support.
Design/methodology/approach: This study introduces a policy fit analysis framework, which decomposes policy fit into three dimensions: consistency fit, embeddedness fit, and compensatory fit. By employing quantitative research methods, the study conducts a multidimensional analysis of China’s science and technology talent policies over the period from 2014 to 2023.
Findings: The findings indicate that, after a decade of evolution, China’s policy system for science and technology talent has largely matured into a relatively stable framework, with policy fit demonstrating an upward trend over time. However, several challenges persist. For instance, the policy system places a disproportionate emphasis on talent cultivation and development, while comparatively fewer policies address the introduction, aggregation, and strategic planning of talent. Additionally, there are observable gaps between policy objectives and actual outcomes, as well as a misalignment between policy supply and the demands of talent development.
Research limitations: The framework of policy fit analysis proposed by the study can only analyze policies at the same level, but it cannot conduct cross-level analysis. In the empirical analysis, the policy texts analyzed were limited to publicly available documents.
Practical implications: The findings provide new perspectives and methodologies for policy evaluation, expanding the scope of existing policy analysis, and also offer meaningful guidance for policymakers and relevant administrative personnel.
Originality/value: This paper introduces, for the first time, a policy fit analysis framework, addressing a gap in the study of policy alignment.
[1] Barry, R.A. (2024). Challenges achieving horizontal coherence across health and public security policies in formulating Uruguay’s cannabis regulation. Health Promotion International, 39(5), daae136. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/daae136
[2] Cao, X.X. (2021). Research on the correspondence between policy application and expertise in rural entrepreneurship of college students. Agricultural Economy, 02,116-118.
[3] Chen, Q.Y., Ye, Y., & Li, X.P. (2024). Quantitative evaluation and spatiotemporal evolution of China’s regional talent policies. Jiangsu Social Sciences, 01, 166-175. https://doi.org/10.13858/j.cnki.cn32-1312/c.20240028.010
[4] He, R. (2024). To develop new quality productive forces, we need to increase the concentration of talents. Yunnan Daily,2024-03-25(005).
[5] Hu, F., Li, J.C., & Zhai, J. (2024). Analysis and Evaluation of Scientific and Technological Talent Policies from the Perspective of Policy Text Measurement: Based on A Two-Dimensional Framework of Tool-Effectiveness. Information Science, 42(06), 99-112. https://doi.org/10.13833/j.issn.1007-7634.2024.06.012
[6] Hu, L. (2009). From eligibility to suitability: new trend of teachers’ employment. Research in Educational Development, 18, 62-65+83. https://doi.org/10.14121/j.cnki.1008-3855.2009.18.009
[7] Liu, R.J., Wang, J., Tang, L.J., Wang, Y.T., & Lin, Z.P. (2023). Quantitative analysis of maternal and child health talents policy in the Yangtze River Delta from the perspective of policy tools. Chinese Journal of Health Policy, 16(11), 31-38.
[8] Li, X., Ma, W.Y., & Lin, F.F. (2023). Quantitative research of China’s science and technology talent policy based on policy multidimensional analysis. Forum on Science and Technology in China, 10,105-118. https://doi.org/10.13580/j.cnki.fstc.2023.10.015
[9] Mea, M., Newton, A., Uyarra, M. C., Alonso, C., & Borja, Á. (2016). From Science to Policy and Society: Enhancing the Effectiveness of Communication. Frontiers in Marine Science,3,168. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2016.00168
[10] Muchinsky P M, Monahan C J. (1987). What is person-environment congruence? Supplementary versus complementary models of fit. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 31(3), https://doi.org/268-277.10.1016/0001-8791(87)90043-1
[11] Mu, R.P., Liao, Y., & Chi, K.J. (2022). Comparative research on policy for outstanding scientists——case on scientist workshop and basic science center projects. China Soft Science, 11, 83-91.
[12] Ning, T.T., Zhang, Z.S. (2014). An analysis of talent policy in China based on the policy tool perspective. Chinese Public Administration, 04, 82-86.
[13] Pan Y.C., Guo, R.H., Song, Y.X., & Lu, X.B. (2023). Quantitative research on science and technology talent policy texts from the perspective of policy tools. Library and Information Service, 67(15), 105-117. https://doi.org/10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2023.15.010
[14] Qiu, Y.M., & Shi, C. (2023). The operational logic of China’s policy diffusion from an intergovernmental relations perspective——a case study of urban talent attraction policies. Jiangxi Social Sciences, 43(10), 183-191.
[15] Sun, H.F., Wang, K., & Xu, F.L. (2016). Research on the relationship between government talent policies and enterprise talent demand. Jilin University Journal Social Sciences Edition, 56(03), 91-100. https://doi.org/10.15939/j.jujsse.2016.03.009
[16] Tao, Z., Pan, Y.J., Li, P.Y., & Yang, J. (2018). Policy matching, resource integration and entrepreneurial ability: based on grounded research of high-level technological talents. Science & Technology Progress and Policy, 35(08), 137-142.
[17] Theis, D. R., & White, M. (2021). Is obesity policy in England fit for purpose? analysis of government strategies and policies, 1992-2020. The Milbank Quarterly, 99(1), 126-170. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0009.12498
[18] Wang, H.J. (2023). A Study on the path of enhancing the entrepreneurial ability of science and technology talents in agriculture related digital business, based on the perspectives of policy compliance, resource integration, and skill expansion. Management of Agricultural Science and Technology, 42(06), 56-60. https://doi.org/10.16849/J.CNKI.ISSN1001-8611.2023.06.016
[19] Wang, Z.H., Chen, J.G., & Ou, J.F. (2021). The mechanism and path of agricultural product circulation system influencing the fluctuation of agricultural products price——based on qualitative analysis of data from field investigation of 92 households. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 29(12), 92-104. https://doi.org/10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2018.0329
[20] Whitsel, L.P., Honeycutt, S., Radcliffe, R. Johnson, J., Chase, P.J., Noyes, P. (2024). Policy implementation and outcome evaluation: establishing a framework and expanding capacity for advocacy organizations to assess the impact of their work in public policy. Health Res Policy Sys, 22, 27. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-024-01110-0
[21] Yang, Y., Guo, J.H., & Yu, X.Y. (2018). Shanghai’s talent policy coordination from the perspective of policy tools. Forum on Science and Technology in China, 04, 148-156. https://doi.org/10.13580/j.cnki.fstc.2018.04.017
[22] Yuan, Y., Chen, J., & Wan, X.X. (2023). Theme hotspots and evolutionary trends of China’s talent policy——An analysis of policy texts from 2012 to 2021. China University Science & Technology, 06, 1-7. https://doi.org/10.16209/j.cnki.cust.2023.06.005
[23] Zhao, F., Chen, Z.F., & Wu, G.X. (2022). Policy analysis of innovation and entrepreneurship talents from the perspective of policy tools——a case study from 17 cities’ policies. Scientific Management Research, 40(04), 144-149. https://doi.org/10.19445/j.cnki.15-1103/g3.2022.04.018
[24] Zhong, Y.H., & Huang, X.B. (2022). The logic and future prospect of the policy change of scientific and technological talents in the centenary of the communist party of China——a historical institutional analysis framework. Scientific Management Research, 40(06), 113-121. https://doi.org/10.19445/j.cnki.15-1103/g3.2022.06.015
[25] Zimmermann, M., & Pye, S. (2018). Inequality in energy and climate policies: Assessing distributional impact consideration in UK policy appraisal. Energy Policy, 123, 594-601. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2018.08.062
